Socioeconomic and Perceptions Statuses: A Case Study of the Agri-Silviculture Community Growers in KwaZulu Natal Province, South Africa

Main Article Content

Phokele Maponya

Abstrakt
Agroforestry holds significant importance in South Africa as a sustainable land-use approach that tackles essential environmental and economic issues, such as climate change adaptation, food security, and the enhancement of rural livelihoods. By combining trees with crops and livestock, it improves soil health, boosts biodiversity, and offers varied income sources, including timber, fruit, and nuts, alongside agricultural products. However, the uptake of agroforestry in South Africa is progressing slowly due to such challenges as limited land availability, water scarcity, and insufficient technical knowledge, as well as misinformation and negative attitudes, particularly among smallholder farmers. Numerous authors have also pointed out that most of the agroforestry research has been conducted from a biophysical standpoint, yet socioeconomic factors related to farmers' perceptions require greater focus. Therefore, there exists a strong willingness among rural households to embrace these practices if provided with adequate support, highlighting the necessity for more effective integration into national policy. The current study aimed to assess the status of agri-silviculture practices concerning socioeconomic factors and community perceptions. The primary objectives included: (1) Identifying and describing the socioeconomic characteristics of selected agri-silviculture community growers, and (2) Evaluating the perception status of these growers. Therefore, this study contributes to the promotion of agroforestry, as it presents the opportunity to boost production and subsequently elevate community income. Identifying and addressing socioeconomic and perceptual factors related to agroforestry practices is crucial for the adoption of agroforestry, which encompasses both economic and sociological aspects. A purposive sampling method was employed to select 90 community growers involved in agri-silviculture (specifically Groundnuts and Eucalyptus Trees). The research employed both qualitative and quantitative methods concurrently and they were applied with the aim on establishing the limitations, balance, and strength of the data. Furthermore, the methods included participatory action research as the community growers and stakeholders benefitted while the research was ongoing. Data collection methods included site observations, past research, and web and governmental reports. The study involved a closed and open-ended questionnaire with the following sections: socioeconomics, food security, sustainability, perceptions, market information, and observations. The results indicated that most of the communities concurred and held a favourable view regarding the competitiveness of agroforestry practices in fulfilling their fundamental requirements for fuel wood, fruits, fodder, timber, vegetables, and more. They also recognised that the adoption of agri-silviculture practices was essential for the community, thereby enhancing its economic, social, and environmental welfare. It is thus recommended that the agri-silviculture practice be intensified throughout South Africa, as it contributes significantly to food security, market access, and sustainable livelihoods.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Maponya, P. (2026). Socioeconomic and Perceptions Statuses: A Case Study of the Agri-Silviculture Community Growers in KwaZulu Natal Province, South Africa. Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW W Warszawie - Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, 26(2), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.22630/PRS.2026.26.2.7
Bibliografia

Adesina A.A., Baidu-Forson, J. (1995). Farmers’ perceptions and adoption of new agricultural technology: evidence from analysis in Burkina Faso and Guinea, West Africa. Agricultural Economics, 13, 1-9.

Agricultural Research Council (NRE). (2024). Pretoria, South Africa.

Ahmad, S., Zhang, C., Ekanayake, E.M.B.P. (2021). Smallholder Farmers’ Perception on Ecological Impacts of Agroforestry: Evidence from Northern Irrigated Plain, Pakistan. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 30(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/130338.

Agricultural Research Council ISCW (ARC-ISCW). (2017). Pretoria, South Africa.

Bentrup, G., Patel-Weynand, T., Stein, S. (2019). Assessing the role of agroforestry in adapting to climate change in the United States, 4th World Agroforestry Congress, 20-22 May 2019 Le Corum, Montpellier, France.

Ephra, E. (2001). Assessment of the role of women in agroforestry systems: a case study of Marangu and Mamba Kilimanjaro region, Tanzania. World Agroforestry Centre. Nairobi, Kenya.

Fleming, A., O’Grady, A.P., Mendham, D., England, J., Mitchell, P., Moroni, M., Lyons, A. (2019). Understanding the values behind farmer perceptions of trees on farms to increase adoption of agroforestry in Australia. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 39, 9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-019-0555-5.

Gerhardt, K., Nemarundwe, N. (2006). Participatory planting and management of indigenous trees: Lessons from Chivi District, Zimbabwe. Agriculture and Human Values, 23, 231-243.

Greene, W. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Jha, S., Kaechele, H., Sieber, S. (2019). Factors influencing the adoption of water conservation technologies by smallholder farmer households in Tanzania. Water, 11(12), 2640; https://doi.org/10.3390/w11122640.

Jose, S. (2009). Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agroforest Systems, 76, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-009-9229-7

KZNDARD (KwaZulu Natal Department of Agriculture and Rural Development). (2020). Annual-Performance-Plan-2020_21.

Mahmood, M.I., Zubair, M. (2020). Farmer’s Perception of and Factors Influencing Agroforestry Practices in the Indus River Basin, Pakistan. Small-scale Forestry, 19,107-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-020-09434-9.

Maponya, P., Madakadze, I.C., Mbili, N., Dube, Z.P., Nkuna, T., Makhwedzhana, M., Tahulela, T., Mongwaketsi, K., Isaacs, L. (2022). Flattening the food insecurity curve through agroforestry: A case study of agrosilviculture community growers in Limpopo and Mpumalanga Provinces, South Africa. In: Microbiome Under Changing Climate Elsevier: ISBN: 978-0-323-90571-8. Chapter 6, 143-159.

Maponya, P., Venter, S.L., Du Plooy, C.P., Backeberg, G.R., Mpandeli, S.N., Nesamvuni, E. (2019). Oral Presentation & Full Paper Publication, Research, Extension Services and Training as key drivers to agroforestry adoption in Limpopo Province, South Africa, 3rd World Irrigation Forum, International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage (ICID), 01-09 September 2019, Bali, Indonesia.

Maponya, P., Venter, S.L., Du Plooy, C.P., Backeberg, G.R., Mpandeli, S.N., Nesamvuni, E. (2018). Oral Presentation & Full Paper Publication, Perceptions on the Constraints to Agroforestry Competitiveness: A Case of Smallholder Farmers in Limpopo Province, 9th International Scientific Agriculture Symposium, 04-07 October 2018, Bosnia-Herzegovonia.

Meijer, S.S., Catacutan, D.O, Ajayi, C., Sileshi, G.W., Nieuwenhuis, M. (2015). The role of knowledge, attitudes and perceptions in the uptake of agricultural and agroforestry innovations among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 13(1), 40-54. ttps://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2014.912493.

Nair, P.K.R. (1985). Classification of agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems, 3, 97-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00122638.

Odum, E. (1969). The strategy of ecosystem development. Science, 164, 262-270.

Price, C. (1995). Moderate discount rates and the competitive case for agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems, 32,

-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00713848.

Rao, M.R., Nair, P.K., Ong, C.K. (1997). Biophysical interactions in tropical agroforestry systems. Agroforestry Systems, 38, 3-50. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005971525590.

Sharmin, A., Rabbi, S.A. (2016). Assessment of farmers’ perception of agroforestry practices in Jhenaidah district of Bangladesh. Journal of Agriculture and Ecology Research International, 6(4), 1-10. DOI: 10.9734/JAERI/2016/21760.

Sibelet, N., Posada, K., Gutierrez-Montes, I. (2019). Agroforestry systems provide firewood for livelihood improvement in Guatemala. Bois & Forests Des Tropiques, 340, 91-102.

Sileshi, G.W., Kuntashula, E., Matakala, P., Nkunika, P.O. (2008). Farmers’ perceptions of tree mortality, pests and pest management practices in agroforestry in Malawi, Mozambique and Zambia. Agroforest Systems, 72,

-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-007-9082-5.

Zerihun, M.F., Muchie, M., Worku, Z. (2014). Determinants of agroforestry technology adoption in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Development Studies Research, 1(1), 382-394. https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2014.977454.

Statystyki

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Rekomendowane teksty