Carbon Footprint of Beef Cattle in a Conventional Production System: a Case Study of a Large-Area Farming Enterprise in the Wielkopolska Region

Main Article Content

Jerzy Bieńkowski
Radosław Dąbrowicz
Małgorzata Holka
Janusz Jankowiak

Abstrakt
Animal production is a significant source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. One of the major challenges in sustainable management is to mitigate the effects of climate change by reducing GHG emissions. The diversity of animal production systems and accompanying diversification of technological processes, mean that specific production effects can be obtained at different levels of GHG emissions. The aim of the study was to determine the carbon footprint (CF) of beef cattle grown in a conventional system (i.e. indoor confinement). The research was carried out on the beef cattle farm belonging to a large-area enterprise, Długie Stare Ltd. The beef cattle production system consisted of the following subsystems: a basic breeding herd (consisting of suckler cows, replacement heifers and calves up to 6.5 months), breeding heifers, breeding bulls and fattening bulls. The method of life cycle analysis (LCA) in the stages from "cradle-to-farmgate" was used to assess the GHG emissions associated with the production of beef cattle. The average CF in the entire beef cattle production system was 25.43 kg of CO2 kg-1 of live weight of marketed cattle, while in the individual subsystems of basic breeding herd, breeding heifers, breeding bulls and fattening bulls, the CF (after GHG allocation) was: 11.0 kg CO2 eq., 34.30 kg CO2 eq., 27.32 and 25.40 kg CO2 eq., respectively. GHG emissions associated with young calves staying in the cow-calf pairs until weaning (in the period from 0-6.5 months), had a decisive influence on the final CF in each of the subsystems of beef cattle production. The second important factor directly affecting the CF was GHG emissions related to methane (CH4) enteric fermentation and manure management. Knowledge of factors affecting the CF structure allows better identification of critical areas in production processes with high GHG emission potential. Information on the CF of beef cattle and beef meat responds to a wider societal demand for the ecological characteristics of market products, which ultimately contributes to improving their market competitiveness.

Article Details

Jak cytować
Bieńkowski, J., Dąbrowicz, R., Holka, M., & Jankowiak, J. (2018). Carbon Footprint of Beef Cattle in a Conventional Production System: a Case Study of a Large-Area Farming Enterprise in the Wielkopolska Region. Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW W Warszawie - Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, 18(3), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.22630/PRS.2018.18.3.63
Bibliografia

Bieńkowski, J., Holka, M., Jankowiak, J. (2017). Assessing the greenhouse gas emissions by carbon footprint in intensive agricultural production based on the examples of winter oilseed rape. Problems of World Agriculture 17, 18-28 (In Polish with English abstract).

Bragaglio, A., Napolitano, F., Pacelli, C., Pirlo, G., Sabia, E., Serrapica, F., Serrapica, F., Braghieri, A. (2018). Environmental impacts of Italian beef production: a comparison between different systems. Journal of Cleaner Production 172, 4033-4043. (Crossref)

BSI (2011). PAS 2050:2011. Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institute, London, UK.

Casey, J.W., Holden, N.M. (2006). Quantification of GHG emissions from sucker-beef production in Ireland. Agricultural Systems 90, 79-98. (Crossref)

Desjardins, R.L., Worth, D.E., Vergé, X.P.C., Maxime, D., Dyer, J., Cerkowniak, D. (2012). Carbon footprint of beef cattle. Sustainability 4, 3279-3301. (Crossref)

Ecoinvent database v. 3.5. 2018. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories.

EEA (2013). EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2013. European Environment Agency, Luxembourg.

EPD (2018). The International EPD System. EPD International AB. Available 20 February 2018 from: https://www.environdec.com.

FAOSTAT (2018). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Crops and livestock products. Available 20 February 2018 from: http: www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/TP.

Gerber, PJ, Steinfeld, H, Henderson, B, Mottet, A, Opio, C, Dijkman, J, Falcucci, A, Tempio, G (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock – A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. FAO, Rome.

GUS (2017). Ochrona środowiska 2017 (Environment 2017). Główny Urząd Statystyczny, Warszawa.

GUS (2018). Bank danych lokalnych. Available 20 February 2018 from: https://bdl.stat.gov.pl/BDL/dane/ podgrup/tablica.

Hegarty, R., Goopy, J., Herd, R., McCorkell, B. (2007). Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production. Journal of Animal Science 85, 1479-1486. (Crossref)

Holka, M., Jankowiak, J., Bieńkowski, J., Dąbrowicz, R. (2016). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of winter wheat in an intensive crop production system in Wielkopolska region (Poland). Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 14, 535-545. (Crossref)

Huijbregts, M., Hellweg, S., Frischknecht, R., Hendriks, H., Hungerbuler, K., Henriks, J. (2010). Cumulative energy demand as predictor for the environmental burden of commodity production. Environmental Science and Technology 44, 2189-2196. (Crossref)

IPCC (2006). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Technical Support Unit, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan.

ISO (2013). ISO/TS 14067:2013. Greenhouse gases - Carbon footprint of products - Requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.

Marinussen, M., van Kernebeek, H., Broekema, R., Groen, E., Kool, A., van Zeist, W.J., Dolman, M., Blonk, H. (2012a). LCI data for the calculation tool Feedprint for greenhouse gas emissions of feed production and utilization. Cultivation oil seeds and oil fruits. Blonk Consultants, Wageningen University and Research Centre.

Marinussen, M., van Kernebeek, H., Broekema, R., Groen, E., Kool, A., van Zeist, W.J., Dolman, M., Blonk, H. (2012b). LCI data for the calculation tool Feedprint for greenhouse gas emissions of feed production and utilization. Cultivation cereal grains. Blonk Consultants, Wageningen University and Research Centre.

Nguyen, T.L.T., Hermansen, J.E., Mogensen, L. (2010). Environmental consequences of different beef production systems in the EU. Journal of Cleaner Production 18, 756-766. (Crossref)

Nguyen, T.T.H., van der Werf, H.M.G., Eugène, M., Veysset, P., Devun, J., Chesneau, G., Doreau, M. (2012). Effects of type of ration and allocation methods on the environmental impacts of beef-production systems. Livestock Science 145, 239-251. (Crossref)

Pelletier, N., Pirog, R., Rasmussen, R. (2010). Comparative life cycle environmental impacts of three beef production strategies in the Upper Midwestern United States. Agricultural Systems 103, 380-389. (Crossref)

Polish Beef Association (2018). QMP system. Polskie Zrzeszenie Producentów Bydła Mięsnego. Available 20 February 2018 from: http://www.pzpbm.pl/node/161?language=en.

PRé Consultants (2018). SimaPro 8.5 Pro. LCA software. Amersfoort, The Netherlands.

Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013. Official Journal of the European Union L347, 20.12.2013, 671-854.

Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel V., Rosales M., Haan C. (2006). Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. FAO, Rome.

Vergé, X.P.C., De Kimpe, C., Desjardins, R.L. (2007). Agricultural production, greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 142, 255-269. (Crossref)

Wiedmann, T., Minx, J. (2007). A definition of ‘Carbon Footprint’. ISA Research and Consulting, Durham, UK.

Statystyki

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.